Homework
Homework 3
-
Truncation in the CLT. We are given an iid sequence \(\{X_i\}_{i \in \Z}\). Suppose \(X_{n,\leq N} = X_n 1_{X_n \leq N}\). Define \(X_{i,> N}\) similarly. Let \(\mu_{i,\cdot}\) and \(\sigma_{i,\cdot}\) be the corresponding mean and variance, and let the corresponding sums be \(S_{n,\leq N}\) and \(S_{n,>N}\). Then the moment method shows
\(\frac{S_{n,\leq N} - n E[X_{n,\leq N}]}{\sigma_{\leq N} \sqrt{N}} \overset{d}{=} N(0,1)\)
Show that
- There is a sequence \(N_n \to \infty\) such that \(S_{n,\leq N_n} \overset{d}{=} N(0,1)\) and \(\sigma_{1,\leq N_n} \to 1\), and
- $S_{n,> N_n} \overset{d}{=} 0$.
- If $A_n \overset{d}{=} A$ and $B_n \overset{d}{=} B$ where $B$ is a degenerate (almost surely deterministic) random variable, then $A_n + B_n \overset{d}{=} A + B$. Conclude the CLT from this.
-
- Recall the \(\epsilon\)-net \(\Sigma\) considered in class. Show that \(\vert \Sigma\vert \geq C^n/\e^{n-1}\).
- Consider a matrix with iid bounded entries \(\{\xi\}_{ij}\). Recall the inequality $\Prob( \| M \| _{op} > A \sqrt{n} ) \leq C \exp( -c A n)$ we proved using the \(\epsilon\)-net method in class. Using the \(\epsilon\)-net method, prove the same inequality for symmetric or Hermitian matrices whose entries are bounded and iid in the upper triangular part of the matrix (\(i \geq j\)).
-
Let \(\{\xi\}_{ij}\) have bounded iid entries. Show, using Talagrand’s inequality, that
\(\E \vert \| M \|_{op} - \operatorname{Med}(\| M\|_{op}) \vert^k = O(1)\) for any fixed \(k\).
- A tree is a connected acyclic graph.
- Show that a connected graph of \(n\) vertices and \(n-1\) edges is a tree.
- Show that a cycle of length \(2n\) is non-crossing iff there is a tree \(n\) of edges and \(n+1\) vertices, such that the cycle lies in the tree and traverses each edge exactly twice.
-
- Consider the integer nearest-neighbor lattice \(\Z^2\). An up-right or staircase walk from \((0,0)\) to \((n,n)\) is a lattice path with \(2n\) edges that can only take steps in \(\{e_1,e_2\}\). A Dyck path from \((0,0)\) to \((n,n)\) is a staircase walk that stays strictly below the diagonal \(y=x\). Show that the number of Dyck paths is given by the Catalan number \(C_{n}\).
- Do Exercise 2.3.12. Is there some connection between this and the reflection principle for random walks and Brownian motion?
-
-
A partition of $[n]$ is a collection of disjoint subsets of $[n]$ whose union is $[n]$. Arrange the integers $1,\ldots,n$ around a circle. We consider a partition to be noncrossing if no two blocks cross each other in the cyclic arrangement; i.e., if $a$, $b$ are in one block and $x$, $y$ are in another, then they are not arranged in the order $a$,$x$,$b$,$y$. In other words, if you draw a line between $a$ and $b$ and $x$ and $y$, they do not cross. Show that the number of partitions of $[n]$ are also counted by the Catalan numbers!
-
Show the recursion
\(C_{n+1} = \sum_{i=0}^n C_i C_{n-i}\)
and deduce
\(C_{n} = \frac{1}{n+1} \binom{2n}{n}\)
-
-
- Do Exercise 2.3.5 (Talagrand’s inequality for symmetric/Hermitian matrices)
-
Do Exercise 2.3.14. By combining the result of the lower Bai-Yin theorem and Talagrand’s inequality, show that with $\xi$ bounded one has
\(\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \| M \|_{op} = 2\)
Homework 2
-
Let \(X_1,\ldots\) be iid random variables such that \(\E[X_1^4] < \infty\). Prove the strong law of large numbers using the method of moments.
-
Prove Hoeffding’s inequality with the optimal constant. The step to complete is the following. Let
\(\psi(y,\theta) = -y \theta + \log ( 1 - y + y \exp(\theta))\)
where \(y \in (0,1)\) and \(\theta \geq 0\). Show that \(\psi(y,\theta) \leq \theta^2/8\).
-
Show that
\(1 + \frac{t^2 \Var(X)}{2} e^{t(b-a)} \leq \exp( 3 t^2 (b-a)^2)\)
and complete the proof of a weaker Hoeffding inequality.
-
Show that McDiarmid’s inequality implies Hoeffding’s inequality: let \(\vert X_i\vert \leq c_i\) for \(i=1,\ldots,n\). Let \(S_n\) be the sum of the \(X_i\). Then
\(\Prob( |S_n - E S_n| \geq \lambda \sum_i c_i^2 ) \leq C \exp( - c \lambda^2).\)
-
Show that there are iid random variables \(\{X_i\}\) (even those with finite variance) for which their sum $S_n$ cannot have a subGaussian tail behavior on all scales. In particular we cannot have
\(\Prob( S_n \leq \lambda \sqrt{n}) \leq C \exp( - c \lambda^2 )\)
for all $\lambda > 0$.
Consider \(X_i \sim \Exponential(1)\). Show
\(M(t) = \frac{1}{1 - t} \quad |t| < 1\)
Let \(I(t)\) be the Legendre transform of \(M(t)\). Then,
\(I(t) = \sup_{s > 0} \left( s t - \log M(t) \right) = t - 1 - \log \left( \frac{t}{t+1} \right).\)
Conclude using Cram'er’s theorem that \(S_n\) does not have a Gaussian tail as specified above.
-
We say that a random variable is sub-Gaussian if
\(\Prob( |X| > t ) \leq 2 \exp \left( - t^2/2C^2 \right)\)
Use Cramer’s theorem to conclude that for sub-Gaussian random variables
\(\Prob ( S_n > \lambda n) \leq 2 \exp( - \lambda^2/4C n )\)
For some constant $C$. Hint: Compute the moment generating function of $X$.
-
Show that the following are equivalent. Let $X \in \R^n$ be an iid vector of standard Gaussians.
- For all 1-Lipschitz functions \(F \colon \R^d \to \R\), there exist constants \(C_1,C_2\) such that
\(\Prob( | F(X) - \E F(X) | > \lambda ) \leq C_1 \exp( - C_2 \lambda^2)\)
- Let \(A\) be a measurable set and \(A_r = \{ y \colon d(y,A) \leq r\}\) be its \(r\)-neighborhood. Then,
\(\Prob(X \in A) \Prob( X \not\in A) \leq C_1 \exp( - C_2 \lambda^2)\)
-
Fill in the details in Talagrand’s concentration inequality:
-
Define the sets \(A_{X_n}\) and \(B\):
\(\begin{align*} A_{X_n} & := \{ z \in \W^{n-1} \colon (z',X_n) \in A \} \\ B & := \{ x \in \W^{n-1} \colon \exists |t| \leq K s.t. (z',t) \in A \} \\ \end{align*}\)
\(d_c(X,A) \leq (1-\lambda)^2 + \lambda d_c(X',A_{X_n})^2 + (1-\lambda) d_c(X',B)^2\)
-
Show
\(\inf_{0 \leq \lambda \leq 1} e^{c(1-\lambda)^2} r^{-\lambda} \leq 2 - r\)
-
Show that we can choose $c > 0$ small enough such that
\((1-p) e^c + p \leq p^{-1}.\)
-
Show
\(\E[ \Prob(X' \in A_{X_n} | X_n ) ] = P(X \in A)\)
-
Homework 1
-
Let \(A\) be a complex Hermitian matrix. Show that \(A\) can be diagonalized by a unitary matrix \(U\); i.e., \(\exists U\) such that
\(\Lambda = U^* A U\)
Show that \(U\) can be chosen to be orthogonal matrix when \(A\) is a real symmetric matrix.
-
Let \(U\) and \(V\) be subspaces. Is \(U \cap V\) a subspace? Is \(U \cup V\) a subspace? How about \(U + V := \{ u + v \colon u \in U \AND v \in V\}\)?
Show the formula
\(dim(U) + dim(V) - dim(U \cap V) = dim(U + V)\)
When \(U \cap V = \{0\}\), then we write \(U + V = U \oplus V\), the direct sum.
-
Let \(H\) be a Hilbert space, and let \(V\) be a closed subspace. Show the decomposition
\(H = V \oplus V^\bot\)
-
Show the permutahedron property in Tao, Exercise 1.3.2.
-
Wielandt minimax formula (Exercise 1.3.3)
-
If \(A\) is a Hermitian matrix, show that \(\Vert A\Vert_{op} = \max(\vert \lambda_1(A)\vert ,\vert \lambda_N(A)\vert\). Also show that \(\Vert A\Vert_{op}\) is a bonafide norm on the space of matrices.
-
Ex 1.3.6 from Tao about using Lidskii’s inequality to get the p-Weilandt-Hoffman inequality.
-
Ex 1.3.7 Show the Schatten p-norms are actually norms on the space of Hermitian matrices. Is it a a norm on the space of all matrices?
-
Ex. 1.3.9 non-commutative Holder inequality.
-
Ex. 1.3.10 Do the Hermitian part of this problem for me.